Comparison

tinbase vs Firebase

Firebase is a mature, proprietary, cloud-only NoSQL platform. tinbase is an open-source, relational, self-hostable one. They rarely swap in place: choosing between them is really choosing a data model and an ownership model.

At a glance

tinbase

Open-source SQL you own and can self-host or embed.

Firebase

A mature, managed, mobile-first NoSQL cloud at global scale.

Feature by feature

tinbase vs Firebase, compared

Colour is a hint, not a verdict: green marks a tinbase strength, amber an area where it is still catching up. Footprint figures come from the reproducible benchmarks.

tinbaseFirebase
LicenseMIT, open sourceProprietary (Google)
DatabaseReal Postgres 17Firestore / Realtime DB (NoSQL)
Data modelRelational: joins, FKs, constraintsDocument / key-value NoSQL
Query languageFull SQL + PostgRESTSDK query API, limited joins
Client SDKsupabase-jsFirebase SDK
Self-hostingYes, single binaryNo, Google-hosted only
Vendor lock-inNone — standard Postgres, export freelyHigh — proprietary APIs & hosting
Runs in the browser / embeddedYes, in-processOffline cache only, no self-host
Managed cloud hostingNot yet (on the roadmap)Yes, mature global infra
Production maturityAlphaBattle-tested at scale
Realtimepostgres_changes, broadcast, presenceFirestore / RTDB listeners
AuthEmail, OAuth, magic link, MFA/TOTPMany providers, phone, anonymous
StorageS3-style with RLS, signed URLsCloud Storage
Access controlPostgres RLS (SQL policies)Security Rules (custom DSL)
Push notificationsNot built-inFCM, mature
PricingFree, open sourcePay-as-you-go, can scale costly

Which should you choose?

Choose tinbase if

  • You want relational SQL, joins, and transactions rather than NoSQL documents
  • You need to own your data and self-host, with no vendor lock-in
  • You want the backend to run offline, in the browser, or embedded on-device
  • You prefer authorization as versioned SQL policies (RLS)

Choose Firebase if

  • You want a fully managed, planet-scale service with no infrastructure to run
  • You depend on Google’s ecosystem: FCM push, Analytics, Crashlytics, mobile SDKs
  • You are shipping to production now and need a battle-tested platform
  • A document / NoSQL model fits your data better than relational tables

Keep exploring

Frequently asked questions

Is tinbase a good Firebase alternative?
It is a strong fit if what pulls you away from Firebase is the lack of SQL, self-hosting, or data ownership. tinbase gives you relational Postgres, open-source MIT licensing, and self-hosting in a single binary. It is not a fit if you need Firebase’s managed global scale or its mobile ecosystem today, since tinbase is alpha.
Can I migrate a Firebase app to tinbase without changes?
No. Firebase and tinbase use different SDKs and different data models. Moving over means switching to the supabase-js client and remodelling Firestore documents as relational Postgres tables. The upside is standard SQL and no lock-in afterwards.
Does tinbase support realtime like Firebase?
Yes. tinbase provides realtime through postgres_changes, broadcast, and presence, with Row Level Security applied so subscribers only receive events for rows they can see. The API is the Supabase Realtime protocol rather than Firestore listeners.
Is tinbase free?
Yes, tinbase is free and open source under the MIT license. You run it yourself, so there are no usage-based bills the way Firebase can accrue at scale.

Try it in one command

No Docker, no sign-up. Point the supabase-js SDK you already know at a real Postgres backend running in a single process.

npx tinbase start