Comparison

tinbase vs Supabase

tinbase and Supabase speak the same protocols, so this is less a rivalry than a division of labour: tinbase for a Docker-free local and embedded backend, hosted Supabase for the managed production platform.

At a glance

tinbase

Local dev and embedded use, no Docker, wire-compatible with Supabase.

Supabase

The full managed production platform, cloud-hosted and battle-tested.

Feature by feature

tinbase vs Supabase, compared

Colour is a hint, not a verdict: green marks a tinbase strength, amber an area where it is still catching up. Footprint figures come from the reproducible benchmarks.

tinbaseSupabase
LicenseMIT, open sourceApache 2.0, open source
DatabaseReal Postgres 17 (native or WASM)Managed Postgres
Client SDKsupabase-js, unchangedsupabase-js
Local dev without DockerYes, one processNo, 12-container Docker stack
Runs in the browser / embeddedYes (PGlite / pg-mem in-process)No
Memory (local dev)~59 MB native, ~66 MB binary~1.4-1.6 GB local stack
Boot time (local)~2 s~1 min (containers)
Self-hostingSingle binary, no runtime depsDocker Compose / Kubernetes
Managed cloud hostingNot yet (on the roadmap)Yes, mature managed platform
Production maturityAlpha — local / prototype / embeddedProduction-ready, widely used
Realtimepostgres_changes, broadcast, presence + RLSSame
AuthEmail, OAuth, magic link, MFA/TOTPFull GoTrue incl. phone, SSO/SAML
StorageS3-style, RLS, signed URLs, TUSSame, plus image transforms
Row Level SecurityPostgres RLS, enforced per-requestPostgres RLS
Migrationssupabase/migrations, portable both waysSame conventions
pgvector, SSO/SAML, phone auth, image transformsSome plannedAvailable

Which should you choose?

Choose tinbase if

  • You want local Supabase development without running Docker
  • You need the backend to run in-process, in a browser tab, or inside a single binary
  • You care about a tiny memory footprint and ~2s boot for CI and prototypes
  • You want to keep supabase-js and your migrations portable to hosted Supabase later

Choose Supabase if

  • You need a managed, production-grade cloud backend today
  • You rely on features tinbase has not reached yet, such as SSO/SAML, phone auth, pgvector, or image transforms
  • You want managed backups, scaling, dashboards, and team collaboration

Keep exploring

Frequently asked questions

Is tinbase a drop-in replacement for Supabase?
For local development, largely yes: tinbase is wire-compatible, so supabase-js and your supabase/migrations work unchanged. It is not a replacement for the hosted Supabase cloud in production — tinbase is alpha and aimed at local dev, prototypes, CI, and embedded or in-browser use. Hosted Supabase stays the production destination.
Do I have to rewrite my code to use tinbase?
No. tinbase implements the same PostgREST, GoTrue, Storage, and Realtime protocols, so you point the official supabase-js client at it and your existing queries, auth flows, and realtime subscriptions run as-is.
Can I move from tinbase to hosted Supabase later?
Yes, that is the intended path. tinbase reads and writes the same supabase/migrations/*.sql and seed.sql files with the same tracking table, so you push the same files to hosted Supabase when you are ready for production.
How much lighter is tinbase than local Supabase?
The Supabase CLI local stack runs about 12 containers at roughly 1.4-1.6 GB of RAM. tinbase serves the same APIs from one process at about 59 MB (native engine) to 66 MB (single binary) under load, and boots in about two seconds instead of a minute.

Try it in one command

No Docker, no sign-up. Point the supabase-js SDK you already know at a real Postgres backend running in a single process.

npx tinbase start